Last week, Mark Zuckerberg Facebook employees for nearly 56 minutes, outlining the company鈥檚 new remote working policies and plans. Facebook joins a growing list of high-visibility technology companies that have recently declared they will allow their employees to keep working remotely indefinitely.
鈥淚 think that it鈥檚 quite possible that over the next 5-10 years about 50% of our people could be working remotely.鈥 鈥擬ark Zuckerberg
The company鈥檚 weekly internal 鈥渢own hall鈥 all-hands meeting was made available via livestream to the public, offering a view into how Facebook leadership are thinking about the future of work at this momentous juncture. Mark鈥檚 articulation of the principles, the thinking, and the new policies that Facebook is putting in place to support remote working is comprehensive and clear. It should serve as a useful reference for leaders at companies thinking about their own plans for instituting remote working.
0. Facebook will pay market rates for equal work
We鈥檙e counting this takeaway as number 鈥0鈥 because this is where most of the attention has already gone and seems to be the only thing people are reacting to from Mark鈥檚 talk. Make no mistake, this absolutely is an important takeaway. We do need to think deep and hard about the as remote working becomes the norm.
But because what Facebook says and does will influence so many other companies, and their remote working policies, we wanted to look at the other important signals and takeaways.
1. This was not a capitulation to worker flexibility
This takeaway is so important, and should be a part of the change narrative for any organization thinking about leaning into remote. Mark said this is not about giving the employees what they want. At least, it鈥檚 not mainly about that, though that is a benefit. Facebook is embracing a more distributed structure because they believe they鈥檒l be able work better that way.
鈥淲e鈥檙e not doing this because it鈥檚 a thing employees have asked for. This is about unlocking innovation and serving our communities better.鈥 鈥擬ark Zuckerberg
2. Desirable talent was getting away
Facebook acknowledged they were losing candidates because they were not able to offer them the remote working arrangements they wanted. The most in-demand talent in the world will have this as a key requirement of employment. For Facebook this is as much about keeping the great people they already have as attracting the bright talents of the future. This consideration should be at the top of the list of reasons for organizations to expand and become more intentional about their remote working. That Facebook is no exception is meaningful.
3. Spreading the opportunity around matters
This one is very close to our hearts at 香港世博鈩. It is great to see Facebook elevate this as a motivator for their broader adoption of remote working. Organizations that can tap the global talent pool and enrich their diversity are going to win over their competitors and have a positive social impact as well.
鈥淚 would want us to live in a country where people can have access to opportunity, no matter where they choose to live.鈥 鈥擬ark Zuckerberg
4. AR and VR are coming to remote working!
Facebook clearly sees this 鈥渞emote working moment鈥 as an opportunity to accelerate the development of new products and technology to more broadly support companies and people at work. Beyond Workplace.
鈥滿oving into remote work will give us the opportunity to advance some of the important new technology we鈥檝e been working on.鈥 鈥擬ark Zuckerberg
It is telling that Zuckerberg referenced Facebook鈥檚 expertise at creating 鈥渃onnection and presence鈥. As we think about how we鈥檙e going to build and sustain social bonds with our remote team mates, whom we may never meet in person, this is certainly an area where Facebook could do exciting things, particularly with AR and VR.
鈥淚f remote presence is going to be increasingly important for how organizations operate, it really makes sense for us to be living our values here.鈥 鈥擬ark Zuckerberg
5. Things feel more egalitarian when we鈥檙e all remote
This was one of the findings that Mark shared from a recent employee survey about remote working during Coronavirus. People said they felt more equal in their ability to participate and contribute to the team when everybody was 鈥渆qually remote鈥. This is where the difference between 鈥渞emote鈥 and 鈥渄istributed鈥 start to really become important, as teams begin to experience a new dynamic. The majority of companies have merely tolerated or allowed remote working, and have never thought about it with much intentionality. It is important to call out these higher-order positive effects from fully-distributed, so teams can aspire to these things as cultural principles.
6. It may be better to go fully-remote than try to be hybrid
Offices are a big unknown right now for Facebook, as they are for tens of thousands of other companies. The decision to go fully-remote, on a potentially permanent basis is something that companies are going to have to face. Think how long it will have to take for companies to re-establish productive norms working in offices again. Not all companies will have Facebook鈥檚 ability to restructure their real estate footprint to suit future needs. And sustaining dual modes until things can be figured out is untenable.
Zuckerberg acknowledged the hard reality that 鈥渇ully remote鈥 (meaning 0 days per week at the office) is what they are institutionalizing, at least for the midterm. Employee survey results said 60% of Facebook employees wanted 鈥渇lexibility鈥 to work both at home and at an office. Zuckerberg made certain it was understood that flexibility is not what is on the table.
鈥淭oday I want to clarify that we鈥檙e going to talk mostly about 鈥榬emote work鈥 not 鈥榝lexibility鈥. Because the reality is we don鈥檛 know what the offices are going to look like.鈥 鈥擬ark Zuckerberg
7. (Long-term) remote working will be a privilege for experienced team members in good standing
This theme is almost as worthy of Twitter chatter as the theme. As Facebook defined the bounds of their remote working policy, it鈥檚 evident they are thinking in terms of two lines. Zuckerberg made it clear that remote working will not be for junior people. Facebook is drawing a line within the organization with tenured people on one side and juniors on the other. This makes sense through a certain lens, as junior people may need supervised onboarding and may not be as well integrated into their teams as more tenured employees. It is quite meaningful and no doubt will be a signal to other organizations that new people to the organization may need to be excluded from remote working privileges.
The other qualification is your performance at work. Nuff said.
鈥淭he second criteria is you have to have very strong recent performance.鈥 鈥擬ark Zuckerberg
8. 鈥淥n-sites鈥 will replace 鈥渙ff-sites鈥
This is a great theme to plant as organizations think about their future of use of office space. Not all companies will have Facebook鈥檚 ability to restructure their real estate commitments to adapt to new use patterns. But, it is good for leaders to start thinking about using space in different ways. When the norm is for everyone to be working remotely, planned time together in physical spaces can be used in much more intentional ways that serve deeper collaboration as well as social bonding.
9. Hybrid organizations must democratize opportunity
Again, good leadership on Facebook鈥檚 part for calling out the importance of protecting access to opportunity and career development among the remote members of the organization. is going to be the model of choice for many companies, as a matter of necessity. This comes with lots of challenges. Among those challenges is the tendency for remote team members to be excluded from access to the 鈥渕echanics of promotion鈥 that rely heavily on co-located experiences. Companies that want to attract great remote talent should prepare a thoughtful articulation of how they address these things. These will be the recruitment differentiators of the next era of work.
鈥淚 think we need to be intentional about crafting good career ladders, so that we can attract great people and we ensure we don鈥檛 create any adverse selection dynamic.鈥 鈥擬ark Zuckerberg
10. Remote workers will need different benefits
Companies that are meaningfully distributed have to think in entirely different ways about enabling work and providing for the wellness and security of their employees. As we de-invest from the concept of the office as the place where employees need to be enabled to work and cared for while they are working, the door is wide open for thinking of creative replacements to the ping pong table and the snack bar.
鈥淚f you鈥檙e going to be video chatting in all day, then you probably need more stuff than just a good computer. Then there are things like food, which I think makes sense in the offices, because we鈥檙e trying to make it easy for people to not have to take half an hour and leave the campus to get something to eat. I just think that鈥檚 something less relevant for people who are working at home, because they can presumably just go to their kitchen and have some food there." 鈥擬ark Zuckerberg
I guess that means no free lunch at home from Facebook 馃檪
鈥